If students don’t learn from reforms, then what do they learn from?

Robert Samuelson of the Washington Post has determined that students don’t learn from school reforms.

“Few subjects inspire more intellectual dishonesty and political puffery than “school reform,’” he wrote recently.

“The larger cause of failure is almost unmentionable: shrunken student motivation. Students, after all, have to do the work. If they aren't motivated, even capable teachers may fail.”

Motivation is weak, he argues, because students don’t like school.

It's a good point. Why then is there such energy spent arguing over school reforms, when the more relevant question it seems is what the school is?

Image: Getty images

By Jennifer (not verified)
September 15, 2010 - 4:45pm

I agree with the energy spent on the subject of "reform" - - shouldn't we be talking about the notion of kids being transformed instead of reformed?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Please include "http://" at the start of your web page URL.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options