Union sees chartering as aid to teacher empowerment

The Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) recently received a grant from the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) to develop a 501c3 to serve as an authorizer of chartered schools in Minnesota. AFT made the investment as part of its innovation fund. Some of the initial news reports stated the MFT itself will apply to become an authorizer and others reported it would make them the first union in the nation to do so.

Let’s set the record straight. The MFT is neither going to operate chartered schools nor will it serve as the authorizer or sponsor of chartered schools. What the MFT will do with the grant is develop a new independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization which, if approved by the Minnesota Department of Education, will serve as an authorizer of chartered schools. This new organization will have a separate board of directors and be completely independent from MFT. It would be able to authorize chartered schools in any Minnesota district, not just Minneapolis. Clearly this MFT leadership effort will begin to change the notion that ‘chartering’ is something that teachers must oppose. In fact, it may become their best ally!

So why would the teacher’s union want to do this? Shouldn’t the union be trying to improve the schools already being run by the district and staffed by the union’s members? Not if you’re Lynn Nordgren, President of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers. Nordgren, in response to MFT members, wants a new role for professional teachers. Teachers now bear the brunt of criticism for learning results but have little say about school models, curriculum, assessment, use of revenue, assignment of principals, selection of teachers, etc. Nordgren, along with support from Education|Evolving, led the development of Minnesota’s “Site-governed Schools” legislation in 2009 but has found little support from school boards, including the Minneapolis district board of education, to advance teacher-led schools under this model. More and more teachers want to be the professional leaders of schools. These teachers are willing to be held accountable by the district board for learning results if in return they are given autonomy over the school including the management or to arrange for the management of the school.

But if district school boards will not give teachers that option, then chartering is the only platform left for them to seek a different way to work. Having a chartered school authorizer open to approving quality union-affiliated, teacher-led schools would be another significant step toward a goal MFT has been seeking for years.

By Nick Ryan (not verified)
August 6, 2010 - 8:17am

I might have missed something, but if teachers are looking to shed administrators and take on the management of their own schools, than what role will the union play? I alway thought that the main purpose of the union was to negotiate conflict between labor/management. If their is no conflict, than why keep paying for the union? I'm thrilled to see that MFT is finally on board with empowering their members, but something is not adding up for me.

By Joe Nathan (not verified)
August 6, 2010 - 9:54am

Again,as Jon makes clear, the MFT would not itself be an authorizer (approver/monitor) of charter public schools, if this new grant is successful. The union will seek to set up a new group that will be an authorizer.

The union could continue to carry out its current roles with teachers in traditional public schools. One of the purposes of the grant is to help the union explore other roles it could play. For example, the union might help curriculum, assessment or other academic advice for teachers who want to create new schools. The union might provide "back office" or legal services to new public schools.

Joe Nathan
Center for School Change
Macalester College
(former member of the St. Paul Federation of Teachers)

By Dan McGuire (not verified)
August 16, 2010 - 10:16am

Joe,
Can you tell me a little more about how that back office support by the union will be funded?

Currently, all funding for the unions comes from the dues of the members it supports. Do you think it has extra funds to sustain ongoing support of non-unionized schools?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Please include "http://" at the start of your web page URL.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options